The Natural Nature Of Life - 957 Words

â€Å"Sublime in nature†, the word itself is enough to know how horrific and dangerous experience that one can experienced from a natural activities. The natural experience that can last forever due to the terror and pain that you faced while experiencing it is called the natural sublime. Natural sublime experience could be anything that can take away your breath because of some kind of horror and astonishment that your faced/remember from that particular [natural sublime] experience. In my case, I had experience a natural sublime, which almost killed me. I have also imagined two other natural sublime experiences that I am planning to do next summer; climbing Mt. Everest and bungee jumping [I am going to experience both in Nepal]. Who want to experience a death? Everyone right? I mean no one wants to die but experiencing it is a whole different idea. My Natural Sublime experienced is no less than that. I experienced a death [not literally]. I was about 12 years old, hanging out with my friends. We had a pond near our house. We went there without our parent’s permission. We were having fun in the pond. As like a swimming pool, the pond had a different water level. Accidently I got into the water where it was more that 20 ft. of water [I didn’t know how to swim]. I was in the water, drowning deep down, almost unconscious. For a few second I didn’t know what to do, I was thinking about how I am going to die soon, I thought about my friends, families [mostly I was scared that IShow MoreRelatedThe Natural Law Theory Of Human Nature954 Words   |  4 Pagesour human nature that makes us feel great when we get a job and makes us feel horrible for something we steal something. This is because it feels natural for us to feel that we did something right or wrong. The natural law theory tells us that an action is morally right if it is natural and an action is wrong if it is unnatural. This means that human morality comes from nature and h as a purpose to live a good life. If someone’s actions are preventing them from making them live a good life, then theirRead MoreThe Wrongfulness Of Euthanasia By J. Gay Williams1473 Words   |  6 Pagestaking the life of a presumably hopeless person† (Gay-Williams 1979, 278). Based off aspects of his definition, Gay-Williams formats his three main arguments against active euthanasia which stem from nature, self-interest, and practical effects. Out of the three proposed arguments, the argument from nature stands out personally, as the least sound. Briefly stated, this argument is not sound because it fails to offer distinction between human characteristics which are the result of natural selectionRead MoreThe Natural Law Theory Essay examples1037 Words   |  5 PagesObeying by the natural law theory is the only true and moral way to live life; especially a life lived in God’s image. God’s presence is a guiding factor to obtaining a moral and virtuous life, which can only be obtained by following the natural law theory. God created a set of laws as a supreme guide for humans to live life, like any law these laws were created to ensure wellbeing for everyone. The laws he created are the civil law, the natural law and the divine law God created them from a lawRead MoreWilla Cather s My Antonia1432 Words   |  6 Pagesà ntonia, Cather uses the theme of the natural world to further expand on the persona of the character, Jim Burden, and his romantic outlook on life. Jim shows a strong bond to nature because it brings back his idyllic childhood memories and the feelings he had of absolute bliss. By connecting the theme of nature to his childhood, Jim presents the idea that he feels dissatisfied as an adult in the city and misses his life on the farm where he was in union with nature. Moreover, Jim links à ntonia, theRead MoreNature And Nature : Emily Dickinson And Walt Whitman1326 Words   |  6 Pages Nature has an undefinable meaning as the theme is utilised in literature, and it has been a topic of reflection within the Romanticists since the beginning of the era. Romanticism and nature and inextricably linked ideas. Poets; Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman wrote during the romantic era, and both drew heavily from aspects of nature in their work. Nature can be paralleled against several things, including humanity and the idea of life and death. The contrast between the natural world and theRead MoreDarwin s Theory Of Natural Selection1189 Words   |  5 Pages When Charles Darwin presented his theory of natural selection in On the Origin of Species he was aware that it would not easily be accepted. Darwin compares the struggle he anticipates to the challenges encountered in other scientific fields, writing, â€Å"The difficulty is the same as felt by so many geologists, when Lyell first insisted that long lines of island cliffs had been formed, and great valleys excavated, by t he slow action of the coast-waves† (Darwin, 392). Darwin anticipates that his theoryRead MoreThe Environmental Issues Of Avatar1395 Words   |  6 Pagesthe Earth by 2154. In particular, Avatar demonstrates the results of overusing natural resources and thus forcing humans to continue to destroy other areas of nature for sources of energy. Since there is no longer energy on Earth, the only option is to seek out energy from a natural habitat where indigenous Na’vis have been living for years. In addition, since there is no energy, Earth is not able to sustain organic life or rich produce. Furthermore, the place is called Pandora and contains an atmosphereRead MoreEssay The Natural Law by Thomas Aquinas1670 Words   |  7 Pagessense guides people, culture, and even whole countries to act in certain ways. Thomas Aquinas called this innate sense the natural law. The natural law is established by God in order to make men more virtuous. When examined closely it is found t hat the natural law contains the precept of all law and, is at odds with certain laws that exist today, specifically abortion. The â€Å"natural law is appointed by reason† (Aquinas IV, 94, 1) and given to everyone. This is very contrary to popular belief that rightRead MoreThe New Technology Can Save Lives960 Words   |  4 Pages(44). When he says this he is talking about the meaning of life. Our early ancestors looked at everything in nature as living, and everything had purpose, but now we look at all of nature’s beauties as resources. Technology is robbing our lives of meaning according to McKibben, while Kurzweil thinks the exact opposite. Mark Sagoff is a philosopher of environmental sciences whom has written a number of books. Sagoff’s book Is Human Nature Obsolete: Genetics, Bioengineering, and the Future of the HumanRead MoreSimilarities Between Wordsworth And Romanticism1488 Words   |  6 Pageswriters to emphasize the beauty of the natural world because they questioned both the advancements of industry and the virtue of human rationalism (Kagan 416-418). British Romantics William Wordsworth and John Keats both embrace the uplifting and inspiring qualities of the natural world in many of their poems. However, while Wordsworth alludes to a spiritual atmosphere in his I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud, Keats directly addresses the temporal qualities of nature in his To Autumn. Wordsworth uses

Five Pillars of Islam Free Essays

According to teachings and beliefs of Islam, the mission is to reform society, making it moral and good. In the traditional practices of Islam, as a child one is taught to memorize the Qur’an. It is said that as one gets older the power of these words helps them in shaping their lives. We will write a custom essay sample on Five Pillars of Islam or any similar topic only for you Order Now The Qur’an teaches that there is only God that should be prayed and worshipped to. There belief is also that when humans wrote down some of God’s original messages the true message was somehow altered and not written correctly. A chant, which is the first thing that infant hears is whispered â€Å"La ilaha ill-Allah Muhammad-un Rasulu-llah† which means (â€Å"There is no god but God, and Muhammad is the Messenger of God†). Islam teaches that Muhammad was God’s messenger hear on earth. Muhammad is said to be the true deliverer, because his scriptures were direct from God. The Qur’an is said to be authentic, the words that God said have not be been changed, but are direct and not translated. One can only find peace and harmony if they believe and surrender to Allah (God). There are two major sins according to Islam. One is called shirk, it means to only worship one God. The other kufr, to be ungrateful to God, or atheist. Islam teaches that one must be fearful and love God. The unseen life show’s that Muslims believe in angels of God, here on earth with specific responsibilities, some recording our every deed. There is also the belief in the after life and hell. The Five Pillars of Islam are considered God’s commandments. The beliefs of Muslims are reflected in these Pillars. The first Pillar, the Shahadah, is believing and professing the unity of God and the messengership of Muhammad. Secondly, it is required that one prays five times per day, facing Mecca. Thirdly, the zakat, which is the donation of at leas two and a half percent of one’s yearly accumulated wealth. Fourth, is fasting, and finally the firth Pillar is hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca, which is expected of every Muslim at least once in their lifetime, performing traditional rituals and practices. Following these commandments are required of all that practice the Islamic religion, paying homage to God. These help to bring one closer to God and all his glory. How to cite Five Pillars of Islam, Papers

Koehler V Cerebos (Aust) Ltd - Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theKoehler v Cerebos (Aust) Ltd. Answer: Introduction In an employment contract, certain terms are fixed between the employer and an employee (Freedland, 2016). But even beyond these terms, there are certain duties of both the employer and employee towards each other. One of such duties of an employer is the duty of care. An employers duty of care towards their staff contains that they have to take required steps which adequately make certain the healthiness, wellbeing and safety of an employee (CCH Australia Limited, 2010). Demonstration of concern for the physical and mental health of the employees is not a legal duty of any employer. Though, it is considered as a key factor which helps in building trust. It also reinforces the commitment of the employees can helps in boosting productivity. Legally, all the relevant health and safety laws along with the employment laws are to be followed in addition to the common law duty of care. The case of Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd[2005] HCA 15 222 CLR 44; 79 ALJR 845; 214 ALR 355 deals wit h this very common law of duty of care of an employer towards its employee. The incidents of work stress stimulated psychiatric illness claims have been prevalent since 1990s. The removal of workers compensation legislation in State of Western Australia has assisted common law claims for work stress stimulated psychiatric illnesses. On April 6, 2005, a key verdict on employees negligence action was given in the case of Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd (Butler, 2006). In this case, the plaintiff was a worker of the Defendant. The Plaintiff believed that she was majorly overworked and did some formal complaints to the Defendant. Though, these complaints never mentioned that she was in distress. Later on, the Plaintiff developed psychiatric illness because of her job and sued for negligence. In the following segments, the arguments as a Defendant of the case have been presented. Arguments as a Defendant The Plaintiff has brought proceedings in the District Court of Western Australia on the claims that the Defendant used to unreasonably overload her with work negligently. This made her strained so much that she suffered major depressive damage which disabled her from functioning. It has further been brought forward by the Plaintiff that the Defendant knew or should have known about the risks of psychological damage to the Plaintiff as a reason of her constant pleadings for reprieve, help and a decrease in her load of work. The Plaintiff has referred to a case of breach of contract and a breach of Section 19(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 which contain the duties of employers (Australasian Legal Information Institute, 2005). It was the duty of the Defendant being an employer, to provide and maintain safe system of work and to provide such information, guidance and command to the employees that are essential to facilitate them to execute their job in a way which does not expose them to hazards. The Plaintiff was completely wrong in saying that the duties as an employer were not fulfilled by the Defendant. The Defendant maintains proper workplace and maintains such workplace which does not expose the employers to any hazards. Further, the defendant has provided with necessary instructions and supervision which is essential to facilitate the employees to execute their job in a way which does not result in exposure to hazards. Further it was not required by the Defendant to hire any particular expertise to anticipate that the worker would experience a threat of damage in the circumstances (Jade, 2004). There was no evidence provided by the Plaintiff to the Defendant which would have alerted the Defendant about the risk of psychiatric injury to the Plaintiff. The plaintiff had made some formal complaints about the excessive workload to the Defendant. The complaints did not in any way, state that she was in distress. The complaints only said that she was not able to complete her job to her contentment as a reason of the high load of work. It is worth noting that the Defendant could not have predicted that the employee would get a psychiatric illness because of the load of work. The Defendant has provided witnesses who clearly show that the Plaintiffs duties did not exceed the reasonable levels. They have further proved that the excessive workload has not caused her disability. There was a lack of exterior signs of suffering or probable damage. The Defendant was not in the position where he could have predicted that the Plaintiff would have been exposed to some threat of damage because of performing her obligations as a part time merchandiser. The complaints did not warrant any measures which had to be taken to thwart the growth of a psychiatric illness. The Plaintiff did not showcase any changes in the demeanor, behavior or the personality regarding the actual symptoms or illness upon her. Without any such information or change in the behavior, the Defendant could not foresee that the Plaintiff was suffering from an illness. Lastly, because of the lack of any proof regarding the psychiatric weakness, there was no ground for finding a foreseeable risk of a psychiatric injury. The Defendant would like to refer to the case of Hatton v Sutherland [2002] (Swarb, 2015). In this case, certain principles were stated by her Ladyship (Hale LJ) to establish for a claim to succeed against an employer (Chan, 2005). Referring to such principle, the Defendant assumed that the Plaintiff could cope up with the usual stress of the job. Further, the Defendant has no knowledge about the circumstances that initiated the claim. Lastly, the claim was neither foreseeable nor was resulted due to a breach of employers duty. The Defendant would also like to draw notice to the case of Barber v Somerset County Council, where it was clearly established that the work expected from the teacher as per demand placed upon him was not justified. The employer should have checked on the teacher during his sick absence. He should have provided the teacher with adequate support. Since, this was not done, the employer was held responsible for a breach of duty to care (Swarb, 2016). But in this case the Defendant never knew about the illness of the Plaintiff. Nor could they have known about such illness in any case. So, the claims of the Plaintiff should be set aside. Summary of the Case Ms Koehler was firstly awarded $856,742 by the Commissioner who evaluated the damages and gave judgment in favor of the Plaintiff. After this, the employer fruitfully appealed the verdict. This was consequently appealed by in the High Court.The employer was not held responsible by the High Court. The Court held that there was enough proof that Ms Koehler's duties were excessive by industry standards. But, the Court acknowledged that the said duties were within the limits placed in the relevant legislative guideline. The Court also held that it was logical for employer to believe that Ms Koehler's complaint of load of work was the result of an industrial relations dispute due to the cutback in her days of work from 5 to 3. Ms Koehler had never mentioned about psychiatric illness. Also, Ms Koehler's situation was not noticeably evident in form of absence from work or distress. The High Court concluded that the employer could not have predicted the threat of psychiatric injury. Conclusion As per the verdict given by the Commissioner, as a Defendant, the employer had to pay up the sum of $856,742. But, on further appeal in the High Court the Defendant was proved right. It was clearly established in the Court that even though the employee was over worked as per the standards of the industry. But as per the legislations and the rules, in the matter of employment, the employee was not over worked. The work that was being done by the employer was within the limits stated in different laws. The High Court was also content that there was no case of a failure in the duty of care by the employer. The employee was not bound to undertake the services of any particular expert who could have foreseen any risk of injury. This was because there was no evidence or proof of any mental injury amongst any of the employees, especially Ms. Koehler. She had not shown any external signs of mental injury nor was there an absence on her part from work by the reasons of illness. There was no evidence which would have alerted the employer about the threat of psychiatric injury to Ms. Koehler (Hor, 2005). The case of Koehler v Cerebos is a landmark decision in context of stress stimulated psychiatric illness in the place of work. The decision of High Court in this case has established that for foreseeing any psychiatric risk, there has to be presence of signs and symptoms in the particular employee which is adequately visible to the employer (Teff, 2008). This case acts as a savior for the employers in related circumstances. This verdict has been welcomed and applauded by the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The Chamber has warm heatedly accepted the decision of High Court about foreseeability of illness. This case shows that the employee has to communicate the problems rather than assuming that the employer knows everything and then holding them accountable for a breach of duty. References Australasian Legal Information Institute (2005) High Court of Australia: Koehlerv Cerebos (Australia) Ltd [2005] HCA 15; (2005) 222 CLR 44; (2005) 214 ALR 355; (2005) 79 ALJR 845 (6 April 2005). [Online] Australasian Legal Information Institute. Available from: [Accessed on 08/09/16] Australasian Legal Information Institute (2005) High Court of Australia: Koehlerv Cerebos (Australia) Ltd [2005] HCA 15; (2005) 222 CLR 44; (2005) 214 ALR 355; (2005) 79 ALJR 845 (6 April 2005). [Online] Australasian Legal Information Institute. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HCA/2005/15.html?stem=0synonyms=0query=koehler#fn20 [Accessed on 08/09/16] Butler, D.A. (2006) Psychiatric injury in the workplace: Directions for cases involving stress or bullying. Torts Law Journal, 14(2), pp 124-134. CCH Australia Limited (2010) Australian Master Fair Work Guide. 1st ed. NSW: CCH Australia Limited. Chan, G. (2005) Koehler v Cerebos (Australia Ltd): Work Stress and Negligently Inflicted Psychiatric Illnesses. University of New South Wales Law Journal 47, 28(3) Freedland, M. (ed) (2016) The Contract of Employment. 1st ed. New York: Oxford university Press. Hor, R. (2005) Torts Special Issue: Case and Comment: Case Notes: Psychiatric Injury in the Workplace: The Implications of Koehler v Cerebos. The Sydney Law Review, 557. Jade (2004) Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd [2004] HCATrans 412. [Online] Jade. Available from: https://jade.io/article/234380 [Accessed on 08/09/16] Lovric, K., and Hawthorne, E. (2016) Psychiatric Illness Claim. [Online] FindLaw Australia. Available from: https://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/716/psychiatric-illness-claim.aspx [Accessed on 08/09/16] Swarb (2015) Sutherland v Hatton; Barber V Somerset County Council and Similar; CA 5 Feb 2002. [Online] Swarb. Available from: https://swarb.co.uk/sutherland-v-hatton-barber-v-somerset-county-council-and-similar-ca-5-feb-2002-3/ [Accessed on 08/09/16] Swarb (2016) Barber v Somerset County Council; HL 1 APR 2004. [Online] Swarb. Available from: https://swarb.co.uk/sutherland-v-hatton-barber-v-somerset-county-council-and-similar-ca-5-feb-2002-3/ [Accessed on 08/09/16] Teff, H. (2008) Causing Psychiatric and Emotional Harm:Reshaping the Boundaries of Legal Liability. Portland: Hart Publishing, pp 163-164